|
February 24, 1998
Journalists usually love a good juicy story. I
've just finished covering one I hated.
I never thought I'd be out shooting a "back
to school" photo in February but today I was, after a grueling
week emotionally, covering a highly inflamed school labor dispute
in Racine.
Though I am loathe to cover anything my family
has any involvement in, I have had no choice.
My wife is a middle school teacher in the Racine
Unified School District...a district with 1,600 teachers; 21,000
students; and 31 schools.
|

Frank Johnson, left, Director
of Employee Relations for the Racine Unified School District;
Douglas E. Witte, an attorney from Madison; school superintendent
Dennis McGoldrick; Keri Paulson, Employee Relations Supervisor,
discuss the school crisis before the district's press conference
announcing an end to the teacher lockout, Tuesday February 24,
1998, at district headquarters. Photo by Mark Hertzberg/Racine
Journal Times |

An empty classroom at Janes
Elementary School Tuesday February 24, 1998 ... District schools
were closed as the teacher lockout continued. Photo by Mark
Hertzberg/Racine Journal Times |
The teachers have been without a new contract
for several years. Teacher strikes have been illegal since a
50-day strike in Racine in 1977, a strike that many people still
seem to be fighting.
The school district says its hands are tied by
salary caps and spending limits imposed by the governor several
years ago because of rising property taxes.
Though school board members have come and gone,
Jim Ennis is still the executive director of the REA, the union.
Ennis evokes images of bare knuckle fighter labor leaders of
yore. He fights with words in TV interviews, though, rather
than with his fists on the docks or in back alleys.
Frank Johnson, the district's Director of Employee
Relations, has less of a public persona than his union rival,
but he is no doubt as powerful. Though school board members
and superintendents have come and gone since he came to the
district, he remains as the unwavering symbol of the district
negotiating teams.
The fault, without doubt, lies on both sides.
And, in the middle of it all, is the Journal Times. We have
been picketed several times in the last week.
Many teachers have never forgiven the JT for ill-conceived
editorial comments during the strike (our reporter's words were
forgotten in the then-publisher's decision to have a daily box
announcing this was Day 16 of the illegal teachers' strike,
or words to that effect).
|
|
We are blamed by some teachers simply because
we are the messenger, but there are those who have more specific
complaints about our editorials, which have generally been against
the REA, and about our reporting of current issues. I know that
some of the teachers I saw picketing us will be ones who will
still regularly call me asking for coverage of events in their
classes and clubs.
We sometimes have inside news about district contract
offers; the REA usually won't comment, saying there is an agreement
to not have either side discuss negotiations. In the past we
have not been welcome in the REA headquarters.
And so we arrive at Monday February 16, when three
schools were closed because so many REA members called in sick
in the first day of what looks like a job action.
|

Sign at the front door of
Janes Elementary School Tuesday February 24, 1998. District schools
were closed as the teacher lockout continued. Photo by Mark
Hertzberg/Racine Journal Times |

Racine Unified School District
superintendent Dennis McGoldrick discusses district strategy before
the school district press conference Tuesday February 24, 1998
at district headquarters. Photo by Mark Hertzberg/Racine Journal
Times |
Eighteen schools were closed over four days of
the sick-out. The union denied that there was any job action.
Ennis said on TV, as he pointed to a Time magazine cover story
about the flu, that union members were protecting the public
from a health hazard by staying home when they were sick. He
laughed when I told him that I had liked his statement, and
that I was giving him a new title. "What was that?"
he asked. "I've appointed you Surgeon General of Racine."
I went to the school district office to cover
a press conference on Monday morning, the first day of this
sick-out. We rarely cover press conferences - talking head photos
are boring and rarely convey any meaningful information - but
the news here was too compelling to ignore.
|
There is an advantage to working in a smaller market like
Racine where you get to know people. While journalists from Milwaukee
headed for the board meeting room, I ducked into the inner sanctum. though
a couple of secretaries balked when they saw me, I ducked my head into
some key peoples' offices and they said they didn't mind my shooting photos
while they worked.
I've always operated under the theory that in such cases
involving public bodies or boards you don't ask...you just go places under
the assumption you have a right to be there until you are asked to leave...otherwise
you just don't get the behind-the-scenes photos.
I then went to REA headquarters where Ennis was meeting.
I knew if I had called ahead, I would be told that we were not welcome.
I walked in, saw Jim in a meeting with the door open, and waved at him.
He said "No photos." We chatted. I told him I'd just been at
district office, and wanted to show both sides of the issue. He then gave
me permission to take pictures. Bingo. We had photos from both sides to
run in Tuesday's paper.
That access granted by both sides continued throughout this
saga.
The sick-outs continued Tuesday. Wednesday we heard that
there was going to be a walkout at Park High School, where our youngest
son is a student. Several people had called us about flyers being circulated
about the walkout. I had to cover the walkout because no one else was
available.
I hung out of sight, as did TV photographer Clay Benson
from WTMJ. Neither of us wanted to precipitate a walkout. However, we
saw students waving from their classes to another TV photographer who
was set up across the street, and whose station van was parked around
the corner with its mast visible in the sky. The bell rang...a few kids
left school, which is not unusual, and then it was party time as about
300 kids streamed out.
Clay and I moved into position and started shooting. Three
of the students had signs supporting the teachers; most of the others
just seemed happy to have a reason to leave school. While my best photo
shows the principal stopping a student and telling her to go back to class,
we didn't use it because it didn't convey the numbers involved in the
walkout as well as another photo.
I then went to Fratt Elementary School which was closed.
I found a teacher who had not called in sick. She told the principal and
me why she felt it was wrong to call in sick if she was not sick, and
consented to being photographed. On the way back to the office I found
some Fratt students who were home for the day because of the sick-out.
I offered four photos at the evening news meeting...two
from the walkout; the teacher; and the kid at home. I stressed that the
teacher photo was particularly important because we had good quotes from
her, and because it was a side of the story we had not told yet. There
was general agreement to use the photo.
I was stunned to open the paper at 5:30 the next morning
and not see the photo. There was a breakdown in the editing process, and
I had not gotten a call I should have gotten about the photo not running.
I was furious.
Mediated talks were scheduled for Thursday at REA headquarters.
Again, I was the only photographer on. I was happy that I had good access
to both sides' meeting rooms before talks began, and we were able to publish
behind the scenes photos from both sides in the dispute. Everything seemed
calm when our schools reporter ducked into the evening news meeting and
said he was headed for a press conference at REA headquarters, but that
there was no settlement.
I decided not to send a photographer because we were stretched
thin, and already had good candid photos which would be more telling than
talking heads. Other desk editors concurred.
Whoops.
Word came back that the district had announced an indefinite
closing of all schools, a teacher lock-out, allegedly because they feared
for students' safety if the sick-outs and student walk outs continued
and escalated, as rumored. That meant no school for my wife or our son,
but it also meant one less paycheck for our family.
|
I dashed over to REA headquarters and then to
district headquarters and was able to get more candids.
Friday was already a scheduled day-off in the
district so Monday was going to be our first day of the lock-out.
I had taken a picture of a crowded hallway at Horlick High School
as students changed classes in December for a teen page story.
I proposed that we run that photo small on Monday's front page
along with a dominant image of a photo of the same hallway,
from the same vantage point, with the same 300mm lens, shot
Friday, to show what Monday's empty school would look like.
Monday was a day for more picketing and for fruitless
negotiation and posturing. Word filtered out that the district
was going to go to court to seek an injunction against the union,
perhaps on Tuesday.
At Noon Tuesday, the REA ordered teachers back
to school, starting Wednesday. The union knew about the coming
court action. The district called a press conference for 2 p.m.
I went to it. We had missed the Noon union press conference
because we didn't know about it.
|

Several dozen teachers listen
to the school district press conference announcing an end to the
teacher lockout Tuesday February 24, 1998 at school district headquarters.
Photo by Mark Hertzberg/Racine Journal Times |

Nancy Hart, left, a fourth
and fifth grade teacher at Red Apple School, talks with Racine
Unified School District Board president Linda Flashinski after
the school district press conference Tuesday February 24, 1998.
Photo by Mark Hertzberg/Racine Journal Times
|
I offered a choice of picket photos,
press conference photos, and photos from private offices during
strategy sessions...and one other photo...to choose from for today's
front page. We led with the other one...of a teacher wearing union
stickers on her jacket talking to the president of the school
board after the press conference.
This morning I shot my "back to
school" photos. A fifth grader, who had union stickers
on her jacket, looked at me and said, "The Journal Times
lies." How does she know? Her mother, who is a teacher,
and her grandmother told her so. "What about the teachers
who called in sick?" I asked. "They lied," she
said. "So," I said, "People who lied are saying
we are liars." I told her both sides in many stories we
cover are often mad at us, which usually means we aren't doing
such a bad job.
(This, by the way, is why we don't use pictures of children
picketing, whether the photos are from school labor disputes,
anti-abortion protests, or anti-war rallies; whether the pictures
are from Racine or San Francisco; we don't like it when adults
tell their children how to think)
|
The personal summation: I think I have done a fair
job covering both sides of an issue I have emotional and family involvement
in; I am seeing friendships damaged and lost over a labor dispute; I am
seeing our community and school district plunged into another needless
abyss that they will never completely recover from. I am literally nauseated
by the whole thing.
The last thing I did before leaving work Tuesday, though,
was to write a letter to Jim Ennis and to the school superintendent, thanking
them both for the access granted in the last week, and asking them to
share the letter with their colleagues. I don't take that kind of access
for granted.
Kids are back in school...talks resume Thursday at 10 a.m...teacher
picketing resumes at 4 p.m. Thursday. The community continues to tread
water. The teachers have long wanted to call attention to their lack of
a contract. They accomplished that. Each side still has contempt for the
other. Feelings have been hurt. Peoples' reputations have been damaged.
Teachers lost three days of pay. The children lost two to three days of
school. The teachers and the district still don't have a new contract.
February 24, 1998
Mark Hertzberg
|